Ultra-Orthodox Jews will take organs
but usually will not donate organs. Why? Does the answer explain the haredi organ smuggling ring broken up yesterday by the FBI?
I answered that question last year in my Jewcy
column. That answer also explains the background for the Israel-based organ
trafficking ring busted (in part) yesterday by the FBI:
The Heretic: How Jewish Law Killed Rabbi Yossie Raichik
|
|
by Shmarya Rosenberg, September 25, 2008
|
|
On Sunday, Jewish law killed a 55-year old American-Israeli
man. Rabbi Yossie Raichik
died of a lung infection. He was waiting in
Raichick headed Chabad’s Children of Chernobyl project.
Children of
Raichik’s transplant didn’t come because the donor’s
family insisted on consulting with an unnamed leading Israeli ultra-Orthodox
rabbinic expert before allowing the transplant. While the rabbi investigated,
the woman’s heart failed and the organs – including the lungs that could have
saved Raichik – were lost. Raichik died soon after.
Unlike kidneys and livers, which if necessary can be removed immediately after
cardiac death, lungs must be taken while
the donor’s heart is still beating. This means the only way to get lungs
for transplant is to take them from patients who are brain stem dead, or from
Chinese political prisoners killed by the government for their organs.
Orthodox rabbinic interpreters of Jewish law seem united in their opposition to
the Chinese option, as everyone should be. But they are divided on the validity
of brain stem death, and it was this divide that killed Yossie
Raichick.
The Jerusalem Talmud, the older brother of the commonly studied and followed
Babylonian Talmud, defines death as the complete, irreversible cessation of
breathing. This is defined in two ways: 1) No discernible air exhaled or
inhaled through the nose, and 2) No respirations discernible
by intently studying the navel area (i.e., the diaphragm).
Manuscript versions of the Babylonian Talmud follow this reading, including the
versions used by leading medieval scholars like Isaac Alfassi,
Nachmanides, Rabbi Asher ben
Yechiel, and many others.
But one medieval scholar living in what was then the remote hinterland of
Jewish communities had a manuscript with a different reading. Unfortunately for
Raichik and many others, that scholar was Rashi, and Rashi wrote what is
considered the seminal commentary on the Talmud. When the printing press came
into use hundreds of years after Rashi’s death, Rashi’s commentary was printed alongside the main text of
the Babylonian Talmud.
Rashi’s version of the Talmud replaced the word
“navel” with the word heart, so death was defined by complete cessation of
breathing and heartbeat. Printers apparently amended the text of the Talmud to
match Rashi’s commentary.
Rashi’s opinion makes most transplants impossible.
For hundreds of years, Jews determined death by placing a feather at the
nostrils and intently watching for signs of breathing. If there were none after
a few minutes, the person was declared dead.
(This was by no means foolproof. Rarely, faint breathing was missed by the
observers. This sometimes led to ‘corpses’ “coming back to life” in their
coffins.)
With the advent of modern medical technology came ventilators and cardiac
resuscitation devices. Suddenly, stopped hearts could be restarted and lungs
too weak to breathe adequately on their own could be assisted.
These and many other advanced medical treatments have allowed very physically
compromised people to live, and some eventually to recover.
Eventually, improved medical technology brought the potential for organ
transplantation. But along with organ transplantation came
a renewed concern about how to determine when a person is really, truly dead.
Medical science uses brain stem death to define death in applicable cases.
Brain stem death is like decapitation. Without a living brain stem, a person
can never breathe independently. He can never regain consciousness. He can
never function in any way, however compromised. And, like decapitation, brain
stem death is irreversible.
If a brain-stem-dead patient is removed from his ventilator, his body will make
no visible or measurable effort to breathe, and his heart will fail.
Based on this, Rabbi Moshe Feinstein (d. 1986), the leading
American ultra-Orthodox rabbi of his era, accepted brain stem death as death, allowing
viable organs to be taken from brain-stem-dead patients.
But many Israeli ultra-Orthodox rabbis disagreed. Even with special tests
devised to prove lack of both spontaneous breathing
and lack of brain function, these rabbis refused to accept brain stem death as
death.
Why?
In the words of nonagenarian
ultra-Orthodox leader Rabbi Yosef Shalom Elyashiv – posted across Jerusalem and
published in ultra-Orthodox papers in late March after Israel passed an organ
donation bill recognizing brain stem death as death – “[A]s long as the heart
is still pumping blood, even in the case of 'brain death,' it is not permitted to
remove any organ from the patient.” And, under banner headlines proclaiming,
“Thou Shalt Not Murder!,” Elyashiv and his followers called reliance on brain stem
death “murder.”
It was those words that apparently caused the donor’s family to delay donation,
and it was those words that apparently caused the
leading ultra-Orthodox rabbi they asked for advice to himself delay.
Taking Elyashiv’s position to an illogical extreme, it could be
argued that a decapitated person with a beating heart and a surgically closed
neck wound is fully alive, even though headless. Indeed, two rabbis, Hershel Schachter and J. David Bleich,
both associated with Manhattan-based
Speaking at an Orthodox medical ethics conference in 2006, Schachter makes significant errors of medical
fact, avers that heart and lung transplantation is murder
– even though he acknowledges the donor’s entire brain may be
irreversibly dead – and misrepresents the original decision of
The truth, however, is
significantly different. The only organs removed from a donor are organs for
which there is a recipient match within the immediate geographic area. If no
such match exists, no organs are taken. Schachter and
many of the other rabbis who permit taking organs but not donating organs must
be aware of this. They simply ignore the truth out of expediency.
It would be one thing if Elyashiv, Schachter, and their followers refrained from accepting
donated organs. But they don’t. While forbidding donating organs, Elyashiv and Schachter have said
nothing about not taking them. Their followers who need organs take organs,
often displacing people on recipient lists who are, themselves, potential
donors registered with various organ donation programs, including the Halachic Organ Donation Society.
This, along with the traditional
Jewish desire to bury the body intact, has caused a dire shortage of organs in
This perception of Jews as organ takers but not givers extends to communities
worldwide with large Orthodox communities. This has sparked fears that
countries will start banning all Jews, not just Israelis, from receiving
donated organs.
Elyashiv and his fellow travelers claim they object
to brain stem death because they want to protect the sanctity of life, and this
may be the case. But medical science has advanced exponentially since the
Talmud was compiled in the 8th century. Just as Orthodox Jews benefit from
those advances, the Jewish law they follow needs to take these advances into
account. Just as we do not mix the potions described in the Talmud to cure
illness, and we do not follow its diet recommendations to promote health, we
should not be basing something as important as death on 1300 year old Talmudic
science – or on a 500 year old printer’s error.
Yossie Raichik’s donor
died. So did Yossie Raichik.
It didn’t have to be that way.